Earlier this year, my sister-in-law asked if I could help her son with his 2nd grade math as his grades had gone down as of late. I agreed and at the next opportune gathering looked things over. He had received an 85 and a 75 on multiple choice tests, but I could not discover his mistakes. In fact, I was certain that he had actually not missed any of the problems that were marked wrong. I consulted with my nephew and discovered that although he was getting correct answers, he was having those answers marked wrong because he was not showing work. I was infuriated and decided to do a little research, have a good conversation with my sister-in-law as to how this should be approached, and, of course, write this blog.

My initial problem was with the fact that the parents and child did not really have a firm grasp on why he was not doing as well on these tests, which meant poor communication from the teacher. The next issue I had concerned the expectation to show work for a multiple choice test, which seems bizarre in my view. Lastly, I was puzzled by the necessity to show work in order to earn credit. Although the first two are disconcerting and creep into my thinking, I chose the third to consider more deeply.

My initial review of internet information revealed that there were some debatable issues about showing work in general and, specifically, the requirement to show work. Some points in favor of showing work were: the process and thinking in mathematics is a vital concern for true mathematical learning and understanding; with work, teachers can find mistakes and suggest corrections; and showing work may help students avoid mistakes as it slows down the solving process for those who rush through their work. Some points of contention were: showing work discounts the value of intuition in math; the “process” for some students may be that they “did it in their heads;” prescribed solving processes may be detrimental to some students, in particular those who are advanced; and slowing down the process can lead to confusion. There really is a great deal going on with these issues which is worthy of contemplation.

The first issue that I have with the showing work requirement is that everyone learns and demonstrates they have acquired math knowledge in different ways, at different paces, and to varying degrees of depth. When one mandates a single process for learning or showing evidence of understanding, this idea of variety is devalued. I can understand the need to know that a student is not cheating or guessing when new skills are introduced, but I do not believe this is a satisfactory motivation in requiring work to be shown, especially since students can copy work as well as answers.

In my nephew’s second-grade work, he was being asked to show work for addition of two-digit numbers. Certainly, one could employ a myriad of methods to calculate these relatively simple arithmetic computations, such as: using the standard algorithm, counting on one’s fingers, using manipulatives, calculating in ones head, drawing pictures, using a calculator, using a computer, or asking a friend. Who is to say which of these is the best, most appropriate, or only acceptable method? Clearly, some of these methods would be unacceptable in an educational setting, but adults use many of these ways to add two-digit numbers regularly. As there are, in reality, various methods of arriving at an answer, why should a student be punished for doing the work in his head, or for example, *not* drawing number blocks representing the problem and answer? Furthermore, how would a teacher determine which method is the correct method for all students to use in order to display their understanding of the solving process? Because there are many ways to arrive at answers, many justifications ought to be acceptable, providing the best learning opportunity for each student. Additionally, there should be no punishment for choosing whichever legitimate method works best for the individual student. Lastly, if doing the work without showing anything is the best method for a student, that method should be honored not disparaged, rewarded rather than punished.

I fear that the purpose of this controversy for some teachers may be that they are unable to comprehend various methods of solving or that they possibly cannot do the work in their own heads; worse, some teachers may not comprehend how one might do the work in one’s head. Simply because the math teacher needs to show work to do certain problems does not necessarily mean the students do also. I wonder if teachers who require work for all students understand that showing work in whichever fashion they deem the “right way” could actually be part of the roadblock to students understanding math well. Additionally, I would be concerned if they truly know their twenty students well enough to know which methods help each to be most successful. Assuming the best rather than dwelling on the worst, however, leads me to a continued exploration of the issue.

While there are varying levels of successful solving, most people skip steps when completing math problems. Upon mastery, for example, arithmetic generally becomes memorized information and does not require that steps be shown, pictures be drawn, or fingers be counted. Although showing work when acquiring new skills is most likely appropriate, as students escape the need to show work, there no longer should be that same requirement. For some students, mastery may occur after showing their work a single time. In fact, the ultimate goal for students is typically to accurately perform arithmetic without showing any work. As mathematics becomes more complicated, beyond arithmetic, students will require varying numbers of steps or representations over varying amounts of time in order to develop mastery; sometimes, no steps are required at these higher levels of complexity. Furthermore, showing work may limit creativity as students could be showing work the one and only way they were taught rather than truly exploring mathematics; showing work could be so time consuming as to limit deeper analysis of mathematical ideas. Lastly, showing work is a process of explaining how one arrived at an answer, which is similar to teaching; all students do not necessarily make adequate teachers.

My last issue concerns the grading aspect of showing work. If showing work is part of the grading process, it is critical that this requirement is clearly communicated, relevant, important, and necessary; without all of those characteristics, grades should not require the showing of work. If a teachers are requiring students to show work simply because they are concerned about cheating, some other options may be to develop multiple versions of questions, make problems that have unique solutions for each student, monitor the class better, or create an environment less conducive to cheating. Also, would paragraph or short answers not be suited better for evaluating understanding than multiple choice? In the end, my concerns with requiring students to show work for credit all boil down to whether the teacher invested significant effort in analyzing this grading requirement, intellectually determined its value for each assignment, and considered alternate methods for evaluating student understanding.

As with many issues in math education, my interest is in determining whether we are helping or hurting students and discovering where others’ beliefs fall on the spectrum, but ultimately I have little authority to make impactful changes across the board. I write this blog, I discuss the issue with my sister-in-law and others, and I hope that others will invest the time to question and seek answers along with us. I am pretty satisfied that I believe the blanket teaching practice of showing work for all students on all problems on every assignment is antieducational and, importantly, detrimental to the mathematical advancement of our brightest math students.

drext727Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.

LikeLiked by 1 person

Bruce BothwellI think you covered it. I hope there is a dialogue with the teacher and perhaps a little intimidation.

LikeLike

abyssbrainI hate doing long calculations when I was still studying. They’re just too tedious for my taste so I liked to use shortcuts instead. That’s why most of my math teachers back then were not fond of me as well…

LikeLike

brettrubicristianPost authorI agree. Gifted math students get it faster and should not be forced to pretend to do steps in order to arrive at answers. Many memorize the facts in a very short time, but are forced to show blocks and diagrams or varying sorts for much longer than needed. As a teacher, I have rarely taken issue with students not showing work. Showing steps is not speedy and the more math involved the more important speed becomes. Of course, there is a flip side. When students need steps to accomplish mathematical tasks, I see no problem with that, either.

LikeLiked by 1 person

abyssbrainOh, it would be very great if you had been my math teacher 🙂

I firmly belive that math is a subject that can promote creativity since you can use many ways in solving a single problem. This is especially true in higher math like number theory, and combinatorics and optimizations. If you’re careful, you would arrive at the same answer no matter which method you used.

That’s why I loved my university studies since my professors didn’t care of what I did as long as I solved the problem.

LikeLike

professorpolarbairReblogged this on Professor Polar Bair.

LikeLiked by 1 person

brettrubicristianPost authorThanks.

LikeLike

Whit FordOne other consideration: math is not just about finding “the answer”; it is also about communicating quantitative analysis to others.

Just as English and Social Studies/History are not just about “read the book” or “learn the history”, but are really about learning to develop arguments to support your position and communicating them effectively, math is about finding an answer AND helping others understand why it is a valid answer. “Others” in Elementary school would include teacher, parents, and peers.

The work habits developed in Elementary school will become increasingly useful as tasks become increasingly complex through high school. Yes, some/many students will solve problems intuitively in Elementary and Middle school, and those intuitive skills should be nurtured, practiced, and recognized at the same time as the other key skills being taught: how to communicate/explain your reasoning to others.

Isn’t just about every “subject” in school really seeking to teach students two things:

– understand what others are communicating

– communicate what you think/feel to others

about feelings, facts, perceptions, quantities, theories, experiments, etc. Math is no different. Yes, learning to solve a type of problem is the first step, but successfully communicating/justifying your solution to others may be the more important step in the grand scheme of things.

And I agree with your points that the teacher needs to communicate, in advance, both their grading scheme and the reasoning behind it with both students and parents. Must try to practice what we preach…

LikeLike